B2

Causative Constructions in Swedish

Kausativa Konstruktioner

This article is part of the Swedish grammar tree on Settemila Lingue.

In Brief

Swedish normally expresses causation with a verb followed by the affected person and another verb. Use få någon att göra något for getting someone to act, låta någon göra något for allowing it, and be någon att göra något for asking; notice that låta has no att before the second verb.

Overview

A causative construction describes a situation in which one person causes, enables, allows, requests, or forces another action. Instead of simply saying that Erik opened the window, for example, you can say that someone got Erik to open it, let Erik open it, or asked Erik to open it. Swedish chooses a different construction according to the kind of influence involved.

The central B2 patterns are få någon att, låta någon, and be någon att. Here någon means the person affected by the request or influence, and the infinitive is the basic verb form, such as öppna “open” or vänta “wait.” The person is grammatically an object—the person receiving the influence—so pronouns take object forms such as mig, dig, honom, henne, oss, er, and dem.

These patterns do not map perfectly onto English make. Swedish often makes the relationship more explicit: presents a successful result, låta presents permission or non-interference, be presents a request, and tvinga presents compulsion. Choosing the verb is therefore as important as getting the word order right.

How It Works

The core patterns

Meaning Swedish pattern Typical interpretation
get someone to act få + object + att + infinitive influence that successfully produces a result
let someone act låta + object + infinitive permission, opportunity, or no interference
ask someone to act be + object + att + infinitive a request; success is not implied
force someone to act tvinga + object + att + infinitive pressure or lack of a real choice

Compare one situation expressed four ways:

  • Jag fick Leo att ringa läkaren. — I got Leo to call the doctor. He did call.
  • Jag lät Leo ringa läkaren. — I let Leo call the doctor.
  • Jag bad Leo att ringa läkaren. — I asked Leo to call the doctor. The sentence does not say whether he did.
  • Jag tvingade Leo att ringa läkaren. — I forced Leo to call the doctor.

Få någon att göra något

The pattern is:

subject + form of få + object + att + infinitive

In Chefen fick oss att stanna, chefen is the person causing the result, oss is the affected person, and stanna is the action that results. The form of carries tense; the final infinitive does not change.

Time Form of Example
present får Hon får barnen att lyssna.
past fick Hon fick barnen att lyssna.
perfect har fått Hon har fått barnen att lyssna.
future/modal ska få, skulle få Hon skulle få barnen att lyssna.

English make can sound forceful, but få någon att often means “manage to get,” “persuade,” or simply “cause.” Context tells you how deliberate the influence is. Filmen fick mig att gråta does not mean that the film forced you; it means that the film caused that reaction.

Do not confuse this pattern with få + infinitive without att. In Du får gå nu, får is modal and means “may” or “are allowed to.” There is no separate object between the two verbs:

  • Du får gå. — You may leave.
  • Jag får dig att gå. — I get you to leave.

Låta någon göra något

With låta, the following infinitive is bare: it has no infinitive marker att.

subject + form of låta + object + infinitive

  • Hon lät barnen leka. — She let the children play.
  • Låt henne komma in. — Let her come in.
  • De har låtit oss använda köket. — They have allowed us to use the kitchen.

The important forms are låter (present), lät (past), and har låtit (perfect). Depending on context, låta can mean actively giving permission or simply allowing something to happen. In an imperative, låt is especially common: Låt mig förklara means “Let me explain.”

Be någon att göra något

The regular expanded pattern is:

subject + form of be + object + att + infinitive

  • Vi bad dem att vänta. — We asked them to wait.
  • Jag har bett Sara att kontrollera siffrorna. — I have asked Sara to check the figures.

The main forms are ber (present), bad (past), and har bett (perfect). In actual Swedish, especially in concise writing and speech, att can also be omitted after be: Jag bad honom vänta. Keeping att is fully natural and makes the clause boundary clear to learners.

A request does not guarantee a result. Jag bad henne att ringa says only that the request was made. Jag fick henne att ringa says that the desired call happened.

Tvinga, övertala and hjälpa

Several related verbs use a similar object-plus-infinitive structure but add a more precise meaning:

  • tvinga någon att göra — force someone to do
  • övertala någon att göra — persuade someone to do
  • uppmana någon att göra — urge or formally instruct someone to do
  • hjälpa någon att göra — help someone to do

With hjälpa, att is often omitted: both hjälpa någon att förstå and hjälpa någon förstå occur. With tvinga, övertala, and uppmana, retain att.

Use object pronouns

Because the affected person follows the first verb as its object, use the object form of a personal pronoun.

Subject form Object form in the construction
jag mig
du dig
han honom
hon henne
vi oss
ni er
de dem

Thus, “She got me to stay” is Hon fick mig att stanna, not Hon fick jag att stanna. In formal written Swedish, write dem as the object. In everyday speech, both de and dem are generally pronounced dom, and informal writing may use dom.

Negating the caused action

Place inte inside the infinitive phrase when the intended result is not doing something:

  • Hon fick honom att inte avbryta. — She got him not to interrupt.
  • Vi bad dem att inte parkera där. — We asked them not to park there.

Negating the first verb gives a different meaning:

  • Hon fick inte honom att stanna. — It was not him that she got to stay (contrastive and marked).
  • Hon fick honom inte att stanna. — She did not manage to get him to stay.

The last distinction depends strongly on stress and context. If clarity matters, rephrase: Hon lyckades inte få honom att stanna (“She did not manage to get him to stay”).

Examples in Context

Swedish English Note
Jag fick honom att skratta. I made him laugh. Fick ... att presents the resulting reaction.
Den starka vinden fick fönstret att slå igen. The strong wind made the window slam shut. The cause need not be a person.
Kan du få skrivaren att fungera? Can you get the printer to work? Common with machines and problems.
Till slut fick vi dem att ändra beslutet. In the end, we got them to change the decision. The result was achieved after effort.
Låt henne komma in. Let her come in. Imperative låt plus bare infinitive.
Hon lät barnen leka i trädgården. She let the children play in the garden. Permission or non-interference.
Låt mig tänka en stund. Let me think for a moment. A frequent conversational formula.
Vi bad dem att vänta utanför. We asked them to wait outside. A request; no result is asserted.
Jag bad teknikern kontrollera anslutningen. I asked the technician to check the connection. Att is naturally omitted here.
Läraren bad oss att inte använda telefonerna. The teacher asked us not to use our phones. Negation belongs to the requested action.
Ingen kan tvinga dig att skriva under. No one can force you to sign. Tvinga expresses compulsion.
Hon övertalade sin kollega att söka jobbet. She persuaded her colleague to apply for the job. Persuasion is made explicit.
Vi hjälpte honom att fylla i blanketten. We helped him fill in the form. Att is possible after hjälpa.
Jag fick cykeln reparerad i går. I had the bicycle repaired yesterday. The object receives a completed service.

Common Mistakes

Adding att after låta

  • Wrong: Hon lät barnen att leka.
  • Right: Hon lät barnen leka.
  • Why: Låta takes an object followed by a bare infinitive. English to is not a reliable guide to Swedish att.

Omitting att after få någon

  • Wrong: Jag fick honom skratta.
  • Right: Jag fick honom att skratta.
  • Why: In the causative pattern with a separate affected person, requires att before the resulting action.

Using a subject pronoun as the object

  • Wrong: De bad vi att vänta.
  • Right: De bad oss att vänta.
  • Why: The people being asked are the object, so vi changes to oss. The same principle gives mig, dig, honom, henne, er, and dem.

Treating every English “make” as göra

  • Wrong: Filmen gjorde mig att gråta.
  • Right: Filmen fick mig att gråta.
  • Why: Swedish does not normally use göra + person + att + verb. Use få ... att for a caused action. However, göra is correct before an adjective: Filmen gjorde mig ledsen (“The film made me sad”).

Assuming be means the action happened

  • Misleading: Jag bad honom att gå when you mean that you successfully got him to leave.
  • Better: Jag fick honom att gå.
  • Why: Be reports the request, not its outcome. Add another clause if both matter: Jag bad honom att gå, och till slut gjorde han det.

Confusing permission with successful influence

  • Wrong meaning: Jag fick henne att gå hem for “I allowed her to go home.”
  • Right: Jag lät henne gå hem.
  • Why: Låta grants permission; få någon att causes or successfully induces the action.

Usage Notes

Få någon att is extremely common and neutral, but its force varies. It can describe deliberate persuasion (få väljarna att ändra sig), practical problem-solving (få datorn att starta), or an involuntary response (få mig att le). If you need to state the method, choose a more exact verb such as övertala “persuade” or tvinga “force.”

Låta can sound direct in the imperative. Låt mig vara! (“Leave me alone!”) is forceful, while Låt mig hjälpa dig (“Let me help you”) is an offer. For a polite request to another person, Swedish often prefers a question with kan or skulle: Skulle du kunna låta fönstret vara öppet?

In speech, be någon att göra and be någon göra are both normal. Formal or administrative language often uses more specific verbs: Polisen uppmanade allmänheten att undvika området (“The police urged the public to avoid the area”). This communicates an official recommendation rather than a personal request.

Swedish infinitive constructions often place an adverb close to the action it modifies. Compare Vi bad honom att snabbt avsluta mötet (“We asked him to finish the meeting quickly”) and Vi bad honom att inte avsluta mötet (“We asked him not to end the meeting”). Keeping the adverb with the final infinitive reduces ambiguity.

Beyond the Basics / Advanced Use

Få något gjort: arranging a service or achieving a result

Swedish can use få + object + past participle. A past participle is a verb form used here to describe the object after an action has been completed, such as reparerad “repaired” or översatt “translated.”

  • Jag fick bilen reparerad. — I had the car repaired / got the car repaired.
  • Vi måste få rapporten översatt före fredag. — We must get the report translated before Friday.
  • Hon fick problemet löst. — She got the problem solved.

The participle normally agrees with the object: bilen reparerad, huset målat, breven skickade. This construction focuses on obtaining the finished result. It does not necessarily identify who performed the work.

Låta göra: commissioning an action

Låta + infinitive + object can mean arranging for someone unspecified to perform a service:

  • De lät bygga ett hus vid sjön. — They had a house built by the lake.
  • Hon lät undersöka proverna på nytt. — She had the samples examined again.

This use is more compact and can sound formal or written. In ordinary conversation, få något gjort is often easier and more transparent.

Låta sig + infinitive

The reflexive pattern låta sig + infinitive means allowing oneself to undergo an action or proving possible to affect in that way:

  • Han lät sig övertalas. — He allowed himself to be persuaded.
  • Texten låter sig inte översättas ordagrant. — The text cannot readily be translated word for word.

The second example is impersonal in meaning: it says that the text does not lend itself to a literal translation. This pattern is more common in careful written Swedish than in casual conversation.

Choosing between a verb and an adjective

English frequently uses make in both verbal and adjectival patterns. Swedish divides them:

  • caused action: Nyheten fick henne att le. — The news made her smile.
  • resulting state: Nyheten gjorde henne glad. — The news made her happy.

With a state, göra + object + adjective is usually the natural construction. With an action, use få + object + att + infinitive. This contrast is one of the most useful ways to avoid English-shaped Swedish.

Practice Tips

  1. Build four-way contrasts. Choose one action, such as ringa, and say that you got, let, asked, and forced someone to do it. Explain how the social relationship changes in each sentence.
  2. Mark the connector. When reviewing examples, underline att after få, be, and tvinga, then circle the missing att after låta. This turns a small but persistent word-order difference into a visual habit.
  3. Retell real situations. After arranging a repair, making a request, or persuading a colleague, describe it with få något gjort, be någon att, or övertala någon att. Then check whether your sentence states only an attempt or also a successful result.

Related Concepts

  • Prerequisite: Conditional Mood — supports polite requests with skulle and hypothetical descriptions of influence.
  • Useful foundation: Object Pronouns — provides forms such as mig, honom, oss, and dem for the affected person.
  • Useful foundation: Infinitive with Att — explains when Swedish infinitives use or omit att.
  • Related: Imperative Mood — helps with frequent forms such as Låt mig ... and direct instructions.

Prerequisite

Conditional Mood in SwedishB1

More B2 concepts

This concept in other languages

Compare across all languages

Practice Causative Constructions in Swedish with a free Settemila Lingue account. We will set up Swedish · B2 and generate cards for this exact grammar concept.

Practice this concept