Future Tense in Persian
آینده
This article is part of the Persian grammar tree on Settemila Lingue.
In Brief
Persian has a distinct future construction: a form of خواستن followed by the main verb's past stem, as in خواهم رفت “I will go.” It is most at home in formal writing, prepared speech, and firm predictions. In everyday conversation, Persian usually uses a present-tense form plus a future time expression instead: فردا میروم “I’m going tomorrow.”
Overview
The Persian future, آینده, is introduced around B1 because it builds on verb stems and personal endings you already know. Its form is compact: conjugate the future auxiliary خواستن “to want” for the subject, then place the past stem of the main verb after it. An auxiliary is a helping verb used to build a tense; the past stem is the base used in the simple past, such as رفتـ in رفتم “I went.”
English speakers need to learn two things at once. First, Persian does have a form that corresponds roughly to English will: او خواهد آمد “he/she will come.” Second, English uses will far more freely in ordinary conversation than Persian uses this formal future. A grammatically correct sentence such as فردا خواهم آمد may sound formal or deliberate where a speaker would naturally say فردا میآیم “I’m coming tomorrow.”
The formal future is nevertheless important. You will meet it in news reports, public announcements, contracts, academic prose, literature, and careful speech. It is also common when the speaker wants to present an outcome as firm, official, or strongly predicted.
How It Works
The basic pattern
The affirmative future follows this order:
subject + conjugated future auxiliary + past stem of the main verb
In من خواهم رفت, خواهم marks first-person singular and رفت is the past stem of رفتن “to go.” Only the auxiliary changes for person; the main verb stays unchanged.
| Person | Auxiliary | Transliteration | Example with رفت | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| من | خواهم | khāham | خواهم رفت | I will go |
| تو | خواهی | khāhi | خواهی رفت | you will go |
| او | خواهد | khāhad | خواهد رفت | he/she will go |
| ما | خواهیم | khāhim | خواهیم رفت | we will go |
| شما | خواهید | khāhid | خواهید رفت | you will go |
| آنها / ایشان | خواهند | khāhand | خواهند رفت | they will go |
Persian often omits the subject pronoun because the ending on the auxiliary already identifies the person. Thus خواهیم دید by itself means “we will see.” Third-person singular خواهد can refer to “he,” “she,” or “it”; Persian does not mark grammatical gender here.
Finding the main verb form
The second element is the verb's past stem, sometimes called the short infinitive because it usually looks like the infinitive without final ن. It is not conjugated and receives no personal ending.
| Infinitive | Past stem | Future form | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| رفتن | رفت | خواهم رفت | I will go |
| آمدن | آمد | خواهد آمد | he/she will come |
| دیدن | دید | خواهیم دید | we will see |
| خوردن | خورد | خواهی خورد | you will eat |
| نوشتن | نوشت | خواهند نوشت | they will write |
| کردن | کرد | خواهید کرد | you will do |
| بودن | بود | خواهد بود | he/she/it will be |
This is why the simple past is the most useful prerequisite. If you know دیدم “I saw,” remove its personal ending ـم to recover دید, then use it after the future auxiliary: خواهم دید “I will see.” Do not use the infinitive دیدن or the present stem بین in this construction.
Negation
To make the formal future negative, add نـ to the auxiliary. The negative marker does not attach to the main verb.
| Person | Negative auxiliary | Example | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| من | نخواهم | نخواهم رفت | I will not go |
| تو | نخواهی | نخواهی رفت | you will not go |
| او | نخواهد | نخواهد رفت | he/she will not go |
| ما | نخواهیم | نخواهیم رفت | we will not go |
| شما | نخواهید | نخواهید رفت | you will not go |
| آنها / ایشان | نخواهند | نخواهند رفت | they will not go |
Compare نخواهم رفت “I will not go” with نمیروم “I am not going / I do not go.” Both can refer to the future in context, but the first is the explicit formal future.
Questions
Persian does not invert the auxiliary and subject as English does. In speech, intonation can turn a statement into a yes/no question; in writing, آیا can mark a formal question.
- آیا فردا خواهید آمد؟ — Will you come tomorrow?
- فردا میآیی؟ — Are you coming tomorrow?
- چه زمانی برخواهند گشت؟ — When will they return?
The question word normally stays in the position required by the Persian sentence rather than forcing English-style will + subject order.
Objects and compound verbs
An object normally appears before the future verb group. The marker را identifies a specific direct object—that is, the person or thing directly affected by the action.
- او را خواهم دید. — I will see him/her.
- این کتاب را خواهیم خواند. — We will read this book.
With a compound verb, the nonverbal element remains before the auxiliary, while the past stem of the verbal element comes after it:
- کار خواهم کرد. — I will work.
- تصمیم خواهیم گرفت. — We will decide.
- شروع خواهد شد. — It will begin.
This can look unusual to an English speaker because the future auxiliary appears inside what you may have learned as one vocabulary unit: تصمیم گرفتن becomes تصمیم خواهیم گرفت.
Examples in Context
| Persian | English | Note |
|---|---|---|
| فردا خواهم رفت. | I will go tomorrow. | Explicit, formal future |
| فردا میروم. | I’m going tomorrow. | Natural conversational alternative |
| او ساعت هشت خواهد آمد. | He/She will come at eight. | Third-person singular |
| ما نتیجه را فردا خواهیم دید. | We will see the result tomorrow. | Specific object before the verb group |
| آیا در جلسه شرکت خواهید کرد؟ | Will you take part in the meeting? | Polite or plural formal question |
| آنها هفتهٔ آینده سفر خواهند کرد. | They will travel next week. | Compound verb |
| این تصمیم مشکلاتی ایجاد خواهد کرد. | This decision will create some problems. | Formal prediction |
| گزارش تا جمعه منتشر خواهد شد. | The report will be published by Friday. | Formal passive, common in news |
| من این موضوع را فراموش نخواهم کرد. | I will not forget this matter. | Negative auxiliary |
| نگران نباش؛ همهچیز خوب خواهد شد. | Don’t worry; everything will be fine. | Reassuring prediction |
| امشب به تو زنگ میزنم. | I’ll call you tonight. | Present tense with clear future time |
| تابستان به شیراز میرویم. | We’re going to Shiraz in the summer. | Planned future in ordinary speech |
| شاید فردا بیاید. | Maybe he/she will come tomorrow. | Subjunctive after شاید, not formal future |
| چه زمانی برخواهید گشت؟ | When will you return? | Prefixed verb in formal style |
These examples show that “future meaning” and “future tense” are not the same thing. امشب به تو زنگ میزنم has a present-tense verb but clearly refers to tonight. Conversely, خواهد شد explicitly marks the future and gives the sentence a more formal or predictive tone.
Common Mistakes
Using the infinitive after the auxiliary
- Wrong: خواهم رفتن
- Right: خواهم رفت
- Why: The main verb must be the past stem رفت, not the full infinitive رفتن.
Conjugating both verbs
- Wrong: خواهم رفتم
- Right: خواهم رفت
- Why: Person is marked only on خواهم. The main verb remains the bare past stem, without ـم, ـی, or another personal ending.
Adding میـ to the formal future
- Wrong: میخواهم رفت when the intended meaning is “I will go”
- Right: خواهم رفت
- Why: میخواهم normally means “I want.” The future auxiliary appears without میـ. For “I want to go,” Persian normally uses میخواهم بروم, with the subjunctive بروم.
Putting the negative marker on the main verb
- Wrong: خواهم نرفت
- Right: نخواهم رفت
- Why: In the standard future construction, negation belongs on the auxiliary: نـ + خواهم.
Copying English will into every future sentence
- Awkward in casual conversation: فردا خواهم رفت.
- More natural conversationally: فردا میروم.
- Why: Persian commonly uses the simple present for arrangements and expected future events when words such as فردا “tomorrow” make the time clear. The formal future is correct, but its register may be heavier than intended.
Keeping a compound verb together
- Wrong: خواهم تصمیم گرفت
- Right: تصمیم خواهم گرفت
- Why: In the formal future, the auxiliary is placed before the verbal past stem گرفت, while تصمیم stays earlier in the clause.
Usage Notes
Formal future versus conversational present
The strongest practical rule is register-based. In formal Persian, خواهد آمد, انجام خواهیم داد, and منتشر خواهد شد are normal and useful. In everyday spoken Persian, speakers often prefer میآید, انجام میدهیم, and similar present forms when the context points forward.
English does something comparable in “I’m leaving tomorrow,” but Persian extends this strategy very widely. Do not assume that a present form must refer to the present moment. Time expressions such as فردا “tomorrow,” هفتهٔ آینده “next week,” and بعداً “later” often do the necessary work.
The present is especially natural for plans and arrangements:
- فردا با مدیر صحبت میکنم. — I’ll talk to the manager tomorrow.
- هفتهٔ بعد امتحان داریم. — We have an exam next week.
The explicit future can add formality, distance, certainty, or the sound of an announced outcome:
- نتایج هفتهٔ آینده اعلام خواهد شد. — The results will be announced next week.
- این تغییر بر همه تأثیر خواهد گذاشت. — This change will affect everyone.
These are tendencies, not rigid rules. A speaker can use the formal future deliberately, and present-tense future reference also appears in writing.
Pronunciation and spelling
In careful standard pronunciation, the forms are commonly represented as khāham, khāhi, khāhad, khāhim, khāhid, and khāhand. In rapid speech, pronunciation may be reduced. Because the whole explicit future is relatively formal, learners should first master the full written forms rather than trying to imitate every conversational reduction.
The zero-width joiner in spellings such as میروم and نمیروم separates the prefix visually from the verb. By contrast, خواهم, خواهی, and the other future auxiliaries are written as single words and are separated from the main verb: خواهم رفت.
The same form as “to want”
The auxiliary comes historically and formally from خواستن “to want,” but modern sentence structure keeps the meanings distinguishable:
- خواهم رفت. — I will go.
- میخواهم بروم. — I want to go.
The second sentence has میخواهم followed by بروم, a subjunctive form used for a desired action. Confusing these patterns changes the meaning, not merely the style.
Beyond the Basics / Advanced Use
Prefixed verbs
With verbs containing prefixes such as برگشتن “to return” or برخاستن “to rise,” formal writing may place the future auxiliary between the prefix and the remaining past stem:
- برخواهم گشت — I will return
- برخواهد خاست — he/she/it will rise
You may also encounter variation influenced by modern usage, but forms such as برخواهد گشت are the traditional standard and are especially visible in edited prose. Treat the whole spelling and order as a pattern to recognize rather than trying to derive it from English word order.
Passive future
The formal future is particularly common in passive constructions. A passive sentence focuses on what receives the action rather than who performs it. Persian builds the passive with شدن “to become,” whose future appears as خواهد شد:
- قرارداد فردا امضا خواهد شد. — The contract will be signed tomorrow.
- اطلاعات بیشتری منتشر خواهد شد. — More information will be published.
This pattern is frequent in institutional, journalistic, and administrative language. It is worth recognizing even if your own conversation usually relies on present forms.
Other ways to refer to the future
Persian chooses among several constructions according to meaning:
| Pattern | Typical meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Present indicative + future context | plan, schedule, expected event | فردا میآیم. |
| Formal future | prediction, announcement, formal statement | فردا خواهم آمد. |
| میخواهم + subjunctive | desire or intention, literally “I want to…” | میخواهم فردا بیایم. |
| شاید + subjunctive | possibility | شاید فردا بیاید. |
These are not interchangeable tense endings. For example, شاید بیاید expresses uncertainty, while خواهد آمد presents the coming as a prediction or expected fact. Learning future reference in Persian therefore means learning which construction fits the speaker’s purpose, not simply replacing English will word for word.
Very formal texts can also build more complex future forms, including combinations equivalent to “will have been” or “will have done.” They are comparatively rare and often avoidable. At this stage, accurate control of خواهم + past stem, its negative, and the conversational present will cover the most useful contrast.
Practice Tips
- Build futures from familiar past forms. Take six simple past forms—رفتم، دیدم، خوردم، نوشتم، کردم، آمدم—remove ـم, and place the remaining stem after each auxiliary. This links the new tense to a pattern you already know.
- Make each idea in two registers. Write pairs such as فردا خواهم آمد and فردا میآیم. Label the first “formal/explicit” and the second “everyday.” This prevents the common habit of overusing the formal future.
- Notice the source. While reading news, underline خواهد / خواهند and look for passive forms such as اعلام خواهد شد. While listening to conversation, instead note present verbs accompanied by فردا, بعداً, or هفتهٔ بعد.
Related Concepts
- Prerequisite: Simple Past Tense — its past stems provide the unchanged main-verb form used in the formal future.
Prerequisite
Simple Past Tense in PersianA2More B1 concepts
This concept in other languages
Compare across all languages
Practice Future Tense in Persian with a free Settemila Lingue account. We will set up Persian · B1 and generate cards for this exact grammar concept.
Practice this concept